January 7, 2003

NEL HOME
AIM & SCOPE
BOARD OF EDITORS
INSTRUCTIONS for Authors
CONTENTS,  Special Issue, VOL.23 Dec 2002
VOL.22, 2001
VOL.21, 2000
VOL.20, 1999
VOL.19, 1998
VOL.18, 1997
CONTACT
SUBSCRIBE order
bar_vert down.gif (6891 bytes)

NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS
including Psychoneuroimmunology, Neuro
psychopharmacology,
Reproductive Medicine, Chronobiology
and Human Ethology
ISSN 0172–780X


CONTENTS SPECIAL ISSUE
HUMAN ETHOLOGY & EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
Vol. 23, Suppl.4, December 2002

Toward an evolutionary psychology of religiosity

Toward an evolutionary psychology of religiosity       [REFERENCES]

Caspar Soeling & Eckart Voland

Submitted: August 30, 2002
Accepted: September 4, 2002

Key words:
evolutionary psychology, religiosity, Darwinian algorithms, cognitive domains, mysticism, ethics, myths, rituals, adaptations

REVIEW ARTICLE
2002; 23(suppl 4) :98–-104
pii: NEL231002R10
PMID: 2496740

Order pdf

ABSTRACT

How can the evolution of religiosity be explained? To answer this question, we attempt to develop an understanding of the psychological domains underlying religious behaviour. We see four evolved domains, the sum and interaction of which constitute religiosity, namely: mysticism, ethics, myths and rituals. Even if the individual content, accents and implementations differ in each specific religion, they nevertheless derive from evolved Darwinian algorithms that are species-specific adaptations of homo sapiens.
Mysticism. Intuitive ontologies are the basis for mystical experiences. Usually they serve to classify reality into animate and inanimate objects, animals or plants, for example. For a variety of psychological reasons, supernatural experiences result from a mixture of different ontological categories.
Ethics. The basis for ethics lies in the social competency of human beings. Ethics is founded on the concept of social exchange (“social-contract algorithm”) with its ideas about reciprocity, fairness, justice, cheater detection, in-group/out-group differentiation, etc.
Myths. The basis for myths is the “language instinct”. We interpret myths as the verbal expression of the cognitive content of those individual modules that constitute the belief system. Above all, myths document the experience and processing of contingency and thus help social bonding.
Rituals. Rituals are based on the handicap principle. By making certain symbols and acts more expensive, they signal commitment for a reliable in-group morale.
In conclusion, we argue that human religiosity emerges from a cognitive interaction between these four domains. Religiosity processes contingencies and enhances co-operation through social bonding, norm setting and cheater detection. It fulfils those functions for which the mental modules of its four domains have evolved so that we feel it appears to be justified to attribute to religiosity the evolutionary status of an adaptation.      [REFERENCES]

 

REFERENCES

1 Mithen S. The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, science and religion. London: Thames and Hudson; 1996.

2 Mithen S. Symbolism and the supernatural. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C, editors. The evolution of culture – An interdisciplinary view. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1999. pp. 147–69.

3 Soeling C. Der Gottesinstinkt – Bausteine für eine evolutionäre Religionstheorie [The god instinct – Elements of an evolutionary theory of religion]. Dissertation, University of Giessen, Germany; 2002 (http://bibd.uni-giessen.de/ghtm/2002/uni/d020116.htm).

4 Fodor JA. The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1983.

5 Pinker S. How the mind works. New York: Norton; 1997.

6 Cosmides L, Tooby J. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J, editors. The adapted mind – Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 163–228.

7 Cosmides L, Tooby J, Barkow JH. Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J, editors. The adapted mind – Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 3–15.

8 Pollak D. Was ist Religion? Probleme der Definition [What is religion? Problems of definition]. Z Religionswiss 995; 3:163–90.

9 Gladigow B. Gottesvorstellungen [Imaginations of God]. In: Cancik H, editor. Handbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe [Handbook of fundamentals in religious science], Vol 3. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1993. pp. 32–49.

10 Boyer P. The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994.

11 Keil F. Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989.

12 Gelman SA, Coley JD, Gottfried GM. Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. In: Hirschfeld L, Gelman SA, editors. Mapping the mind: Domain specifity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. pp. 341–65.

13 Guthrie SG. Faces in the clouds: New theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.

14 Kirkpatrick LA. Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. J Pers 1999; 67:921–52.

15 Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

16 Kueng H, Kuschel K-J. editors. A global ethic – The declaration of the parliament of world’s religions. London: SCM Press; 1993.

17 Hartung J. Love thy neighbor: the evolution of in-group morality. Skeptic 1995; 3(4):86–99.

18 Ridley M. The origins of virtue: Human instinct and the evolution of cooperation. New York: Viking; 1996.

19 Gigerenzer G, Hug K. Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating and perspective change. Cognition 1992; 42:127–71.

20 Mealey L, Daood C, Krage M. Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethol Sociobiol 1996; 17: 119–28.

21 Oda R. Biased face recognition in the prisoner‘s dilemma game. Evol Hum Behav 1997; 18:309–15.

22 Cronk L. Evolutionary theories of morality and the manipulative use of signals. Zygon 1994; 29:81–101.

23 Hübner K. Mythos (philosophisch) [Myth (philosophical) In: Balz HB, Krause G, Müller G, editors. Theologische Real Enzyklopädie [Encyklopaedia of theology], Vol. 23. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1994. pp. 597–608.

24 Stolz F. Grundzüge der Religionswissenschaft [Outline of religious science]. 2nd edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht; 1997.

25 Bürkle H. Mythos (Begriff, religionsgeschichtlich) [Myth (concept, in the history of religion]. In: Kasper W, editor. Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche [Encyclopaedia for theology and church], Vol. 7. Freiburg: Herder; 1998. pp. 597–600.

26 Pinker S. The language instinct. London: Lane; 1994.

27 Burkert W. Creation of the sacred: Tracks of biology in early religions. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.

28 Bischof N. Das Kraftfeld der Mythen [The force field of myths]. München: Piper; 1996.

29 Kierkegaard S. The sickness onto death. In: Hong H, editor. Kierkegaard’s writings, Vol. 19. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1980.

30 Dobzhansky T. On religion, death and evolutionary adaptation. Zygon 1966; 1:361–80.

31 Douglas M. Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge; 1966. (Reprint 1995).

32 Flasch K. Augustin: Einführung in sein Denken [Augustin: Introduction to his thinking]. Stuttgart: Reclam; 1980.

33 Alexander R. The biology of moral systems. Hawthorne: Aldine DeGruyter; 1997.

34 Dunbar RIM. Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber; 1996.

35 Assmann J. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität [Cultural memory: writing, memory and political identity]. München: Piper; 1992.

36 Thiel JF. Religionsethnologie [Ethnology of Religions]. Berlin: Reimer; 1984.

37 Zahavi A, Zahavi A. The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.

38 Irons W. Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In: Nesse RM, editor. Evolution and the capacity for commitment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001. pp. 292–309.

39 Rappaport RA. The sacred in human evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1971; 2:23–44.

40 Rappaport RA. Ecology meaning and religion. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books; 1979.

41 Knight C. Ritual/speech coevolution: A solution to the problem of deception. In: Hurford JR, Studdert-Kennedy M, Knight C, editors. Approaches to the evolution of language – Social and cognitive bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 68–91.

 

ORDER PDF
"Toward an evolutionary psychology of religiosity"

1. Secure online payment, PDF USD 35.00:  
Buy PDF Now
      Check Out
Goods and services provided by Neuroendocrinology Letters
Sold by 2CheckOut.com Inc. (Ohio, USA).

2. Send also an email to: publisher@nel.edu with following information:
Vol.23 Special Issue (suppl.4). ARTICLE TITLE:
Toward an evolutionary psychology of religiosity
" -- pdf article order.
Delivery method: _____ (either email or fax or regular airmail). Thank you.

ORDER THIS ISSUE
"Human Ethology and Evolutionary Psychology"

1. Payment can be made by check or wire transfer.
Please contact publisher@nel.edu for details.

2. Online CreditCard payment through Secure Server.
Please follow the links below:
Buy Now    Check Out
Goods and services provided by Neuroendocrinology Letters
Sold by 2CheckOut.com Inc. (Ohio, USA).

NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS
including Psychoneuroimmunology, Neuro
psychopharmacology,
Reproductive Medicine, Chronobiology
and Human Ethology
ISSN 0172–780X


A peer-reviewed transdisciplinary Journal covering Neuroendocrinology, Psychoneuroimmunology, Neuropsychopharmacology, Reproductive Medicine, Chronobiology and Human Ethology for RAPID publication of Original Papers, Review Articles, State-of-the-Art, Clinical Reports, Meta-Analyses and other contributions from all the fields covered by Neuroendocrinology Letters. E-mail: info@nel.edu

Copyright  Neuroendocrinology Letters 2001
All rights reserved. No part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or ortherwise, without prior written permission from the Editor-in-Chief: editor@nel.edu
INDEXED IN:
  Web of Science, Science Citation Index, (on the Internet), ISI, PA, USA
  Research Alert (a current awareness service), ISI, PA, USA
  Neurosciences Citation Index (on compact disk), ISI, PA, USA
  MEDLINE / Index Medicus

  Excerpta Medica
  Embase
  Chemical Abstracts
  INIST-CNRS
  OMNI

View current statistics